thread oben
Einklappen
Ankündigung
Einklappen
Keine Ankündigung bisher.
Joe Jackson kündigt Klage gegen Murray an
Einklappen
X
-
@lillie
Joe Jackson WAR für seinen Sohn da als er ihn brauchte!
Ich kann das ganz und gar nachvollziehen.
Bin mir auch ganz sicher ,dass er soweit geht wie er kann.
Joe ist ein *alter Knochen*,der gibt nicht so einfach nach und wenn es das letzte ist was er noch
in seinem Leben macht.Er kämpft für Michael bis zum Schluss,dessen bin ich mir ganz sicher
Kommentar
-
Zitat von babbelgam Beitrag anzeigenVilleicht geht ihm das zu lange und ich denke mal,er hat sich beraten lassen!?
Bei einer Zivilklage wegen widerrechtlicher Tötung geht es um finanzielle Entschädigungen , Schadensersatz , Schmerzensgeld u. dergleichen....wie Hippolytos so schon schrieb...um den schnöden Mammon...nicht um Gerechtigkeit für Michael.Zuletzt geändert von Christine3110; 25.03.2010, 21:53.
Kommentar
-
Jo ist der einzige für mich, der um Gerechtigkeit für seinen Sohn kämpft.
Und mein Gefühl dazu noch, der hat aufrichtige Interesse daran die Wahrheit ans Licht zu bringen.
Ich wünsche ihm von ganzem Herzen Gesundheit und die Kraft das ganze durchzuziehen.
Kommentar
-
Zitat von Biggi25 Beitrag anzeigenZivilprozeße können sowieso erst nach Abschluß des Strafprozeßes begonnen werden. Die laufen nicht parallel. Nur von was will Joe die Anwälte bezahlen???
Kommentar
-
Zitat von Christine3110 Beitrag anzeigenMit Sicherheit! Er hat doch Herrn RA Oxman.
Bei einer Zivilklage wegen widerrechtlicher Tötung geht es um finanzielle Entschädigungen , Schadensersatz , Schmerzensgeld u. dergleichen....wie Hippolytos so schon schrieb...um den schnöden Mammon...nicht um Gerechtigkeit für Michael.
Kommentar
-
ich möchte mir auch nicht anmaßen zu sagen, es ginge Joe nur ums Geld. Als er bei einem Interview sagte "it's my son." (oder so ähnlich), hatte ich das Gefühl, er kämpft mit den Tränen. Und bei dem Video von dem Tag von Michaels Freispruch, als er hinter ihm läuft, hat er seine Hände auf die Seiten oberhalb von Michaels Hüfte gelegt, als ob er ihn halten wolle. Das fand ich sehr berührend.
Aus eigener Erfahrung weiß ich, dass auch Eltern, die das nicht so zeigen können, ihre Kinder aber dennoch lieben. Und das möchte ich keiner Mutter und keinem Vater absprechen. Auch nicht Joe.
Kommentar
-
In the state of California, the law relating to claims for the loss resulting from wrongful death is a creature of statute and it may often be found complicated or even unfounded. You need to understand your rights and those of others when someone you love dies due to others' actions.
If the death was caused by negligence or intentional misconduct of another person, it is considered wrongful death. This also includes malpractice by a doctor who fails to treat a curable condition in time, or performs a surgery carelessly that results in death. The deceased's loved ones often have a valid claim after car accidents, slips, trips and falls that lead to unexpected deaths. The same rights follow in the event that an intentional act, like assault and battery, directly results in death.
One of the most conflicting decisions to make in law regarding wrongful death is determining who is allowed, or has standing, to bring a lawsuit. The standing is the right to bring a wrongful death action and that depends on statutes that deal with the order in which the surviving people are entitled to the belongings of the dead. For instance, usually in a wrongful death action the ones with standing are the husband or wife and the kids. Typically, siblings, parents, and other family members of the victim lack standing to bring a suit, but there are complex rules with some exceptions to determine who is able to recover damages that can sometimes allow those people to have standing.
Such instances could be if there are no children or spouse, then the domestic partner may bring suit. In cases where the immediate family is not alive, then it would go to next surviving relative which would be the grandchildren if there were any.
It is correct even if the parents of the deceased are alive, unless either of them or both were supported by the dead. Complicating matters even further the surviving spouse of a void or voidable marriage who's found by the court to have believed in good faith the marriage to the decedent was valid may have a viable suit.
Damages can be addressed only after standing has been determined. Never forget that damages in these and other personal injury actions can be generally classified as economic or non-economic. Economic damages are intended to cover funeral expenses, burial expenses, and lost support. Damages not affecting economy include the loss of relationship between surviving loved ones and the deceased.
Detailed Economic Damages:
1. Financial support contributed by the decedent to the family during either the life expectancy before his/her death or the life expectancy of surviving loved one, whichever one is shorter;
2. The shortfall of gifts or other such benefits that are anticipated to be received by the loved person from the deceased;
3. Cost of funeral and burial;
4. An estimate of the household services that the decedent would have offered.
In the case of non-economic damages, law to the following limits the recovery:
1. Loss of the love, care, protection, or help from the deceased;
2. Loss of romantic/sexual contact and the enjoyment once allowed or
3. Loss of training and advice that the deceased would have given.
The rules do not permit: any sorrow, grief, or mental anguish of the loved one, the decedent's pain and suffering, poverty, or wealth of any surviving party.
Statues and case decisions do not permit the recovery of punitive damages in wrongful death actions. This is not the case if the defendant is convicted of a felony homicide connected with the death. (California Civil Code, § 3294(d).) The judge, but not the jury, usually allocates any money to the survivors because there are generally conflicts of interest between the remaining parties. The case Canavin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d512) In the circumstance that more than one surviving loved ones pursue a claim by way of jury trial, the jury's award will represent a sum for all survivors, which will be subsequently distributed by the court. Usually an agreement between the families is the reason a wrongful death action is settled before trial. If minor children are involved, the court needs to approve the settlement and how much money the kids will get.
All information provided above is simply a review of the general laws of wrongful deaths in California. This should not be taken as legal advice for any case. The law is extremely complex; thus, a trial attorney with the right experience should be consulted when you have questions after such a tragic loss.
Kommentar
-
Zitat von geli2709 Beitrag anzeigenBei Murray ist doch nichts zu holen, das weiß sicher Joe auch schon längst. Von daher!?
Kommentar
-
Sorry, dass ich wieder davon anfange, aber dieser Oxman geht mir echt aufen Zeiger!
Nun stellt er es sogar so hin, als wäre er 2005 der Held gewesen u. nicht Th. Mesereau
Oxmans facebook administrator antwortet hier auf Mails von Fans :
Mr.Oxman must use discretion as to what he can share with the fans and the media. When it comes to the litigation things are often much more complicated than they appear on the surface. Rest assured that Mr.Oxman has been very busy putting the pieces of this mystery together, just as he did when he uncovered the evidence that proved Michael Jackson was innocent in 2005, which is a little known fact. Thank you for understanding.
Esther, Mr.Oxman did ALL of the RESEARCH and then was able to piece it together to prove that Michael was innocent. It is ALL Mr.Oxman's evidence that TM used in the trial and once he had it, he no longer wanted Mr.Oxman in the picture. Further more it was Mr. Oxman who brought TM onto the case. Mr.Oxman worked directly for MJ, he never worked for ... See More TM so he could not be fired by TM and he was not fired by MJ. Mr.Oxman continued to work for MJ even when he was no longer attending court due to the conflict with TM. I know all of this to be the truth. Mr.Oxman has remained quiet about it for years, but I am tired of reading the lies that are out there.
Further more how rude of you to come onto Mr.Oxman's page and insult him. If you think so little of him then leave the page and go become of fan of TM. I am sure that he is working very hard for the cause of Justice for Michael! In fact he has been doing a great job stating Michael's death is nothing more than a manslaughter case.
"This is not really an effort to get monetary compensation," Oxman says. "Joe Jackson is looking for justice."
Wenn man als Anwalt nicht weiß um was es in einem Zivilprozeß geht, dann sollte man sich einen anderen Job suchen.
Kommentar
-
Sorry, dass ich wieder davon anfange, aber dieser Oxman geht mir echt aufen Zeiger!
Kommentar
thread unten
Einklappen
Kommentar