Anklage gegen Murray und AEG durch Joe Jackson

[Lena]

Na hoffen wir mal, dass Oxman nun keine Gelegenheit mehr hat seinen geistigen Dünnpfiff vor den Kameras zu verbreiten.

Hier übrigens mein Lieblingsfoto von Oxman:

[Hippolytos]

ich habe da mal ne Frage:

Zitat aus Lenas Beitrag, heute, 15,54 Uhr:

Die Gründe (siehe PDF) sind vielfälig: Missachtung der richterlichen Anordnung, Nichtbeachtung der gerichtlichen Sanktionen, Vermischung von pers. Fonds mit Kliententreuhandkontos, moralische Verworfenheit, Unehrlichkeit, mangelnde Zusammenarbeit/Verschuldung

Ist das so etwas, wie Herr Oxman es den Fans auf Twitter von RA Branca erzählt hat in Bezug auf Michael ?

Interessen-Konflikt und so?

[Lena]

Frage mich gerade warum Oxman seine facebook-Freunde nicht mal auf den neusten Sachstand bringt.

Sein Beweisfoto über sein Date mit Freundin Gloria Alred prangert hingegen immer noch auf der ersten Seite.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Brian-Oxman/269101212261

Jetzt dürfte er ja noch mehr Zeit für sie finden. Aber wer weiß. Vielleicht wechselt Oxman jetzt auch einfach seinen Job u. er wird nun offizieller Sprecher v. Joe Jackson u. der Jackson-Family. Das lief ja bislang quasi nebenberuflich.

[geli2709]

Ein Richter entschied am Mittwoch, dass Joe Jackson in seiner Klage gegen Murray fortfahren kann.


Judge Tentatives Rules Joe Jackson Can Move Forward With Murray Negligence Claim

(CNS) Posted Wednesday April 13, 2011 – 3:20pm

A judge tentatively ruled today that singer Michael Jackson's father can move forward with a negligence claim against a Las Vegas pharmacy concerning the death of his son.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Johnson -- who will hear arguments from attorneys tomorrow before issuing a final ruling -- says the details in the suit filed Nov. 30 establish a basic case for negligence against Applied Pharmacy Services.

Joe Jackson's suit alleges company officials shipped propofol to the entertainer's physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, at a residential address in Santa Monica even though they should have known the amounts were excessive and not going to be used for legitimate medical purposes.

Federal regulations prohibit pharmacies from shipping certain drugs like propofol, typically used in a clinical setting during surgery, to a location not registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The entertainer died June 25, 2009, at age 50 of acute propofol intoxication.

Lawyers for the pharmacy maintain the company had no obligation to warn the singer of the drug's effects and that Murray's alleged actions caused his death.

The 82-year-old Jackson family patriarch also sued Murray in the same lawsuit, alleging wrongful death.

The physician's lawyers maintain he waited too long to file the case, but Johnson has asked for more information before ruling on a motion to dismiss the part of the case against Murray.

Murray has pleaded not guilty in a separate criminal case in which he is charged with involuntary manslaughter in the singer's death.

Jury selection in his trial is under way in downtown Los Angeles.

Joe Jackson initially filed a wrongful death claim against Murray in U.S. District Court last June 25. However, a federal judge declined to hear the case and said it should be brought in Superior Court.

The complaint alleges Murray was negligent in administering propofol to Jackson and that he did not tell paramedics that he gave the singer the drug.

http://www.bhcourier.com/article/Local/Local/Judge_Tentatives_Rules_Joe_Jackson_Can_Move_Forward_With_Murray_Negligence_Claim/75648

[Lena]

Sowohl die Anwälte von AEG als auch von Kathrine Jackson wollen nicht, dass ihr Fall in irgendeiner Weise mit der Klage von Joe Jackson gegen Murray verlinkt wird. Der Antrag kam ja von Oxman für Joe. Eine Entscheidung darüber ist aber noch nicht gefallen.
Judge Mulls Consolidation of MJ Civil Suits

(CNS) Posted Wednesday April 27, 2011 – 11:00am
A judge considering Katherine Jackson's negligence lawsuit against AEG Live today said that she wants more time to decide if it should be consolidated with one filed by the late King of Pop's father.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos said she would study the issue. Katherine Jackson's estranged husband, Joe, is suing Dr. Conrad Murray, alleging wrongful death in Michael Jackson's June 25, 2009, death due to complications from an overdose of propofol.
"Maybe it will stay here,' the judge said, "maybe it won't.'
Palazuelos said she wants to talk to presiding Judge Carolyn Kuhl before making a final decision.
Lawyers for Katherine Jackson and AEG Live say they do not want the case linked in any way with a Joe Jackson's case against Murray. Murray is charged with involuntary manslaughter in the singer's death.
Joe Jackson's case -- now before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Johnson -- alleges Murray was negligent in administering propofol to Jackson and that he did not tell paramedics that he gave the singer the drug. Johnson this week denied a motion by Murray's attorneys to dismiss the case on grounds it was not filed on time.
The Jackson family patriarch's lawyer, Brian Oxman, filed a "notice of related cases' with Palazuelos. Oxman said he is agreeable to either Palazuelos or Johnson hearing the case.
Katherine Jackson's suit alleges AEG Live is responsible for the medical decisions made by Murray, who has pleaded not guilty to the involuntary manslaughter charge.
Because Katherine Jackson's is the older of the two lawsuits, Superior Court rules say Palazuelos is the one who makes the decision whether to have both of them before her.
Lawyers for AEG Live say the cases have nothing to do with each other.
"Whereas the vast majority of the factual allegations in Joseph Jackson's complaint concern the day of Michael Jackson's death and subsequent events, the allegations in Katherine Jackson's complaint almost entirely concern events prior to Michael Jackson's death,' the AEG Live court papers state.
Katherine Jackson's lawyers concur, saying in their court papers that her case has "the distinct factual and legal issues of AEG's direct negligence and whether or not it employed Dr. Conrad Murray.'
Copyright © 2011 City News Service

http://www.bhcourier.com/article/Loc...il_Suits/75780

[geli2709]

29.04.2011: Evt. Zusammenführung von Zivilklagen?

Richterin Palazuelos, die in der Sache Katherine Jackson gegen AEG Live zuständig ist, wird aufgrund eines Dokuments von Joe Jacksons Anwalt, Brian Oxman, entscheiden, ob Katherines Klage gegen AEG Live mit derjenigen von Joe Jackson gegen Dr. Murray zusammengeführt werden soll. Da Katherine Jackson ihre Klage zuerst eingereicht hatte, entscheidet gemäss den Regeln des Superior Court, die für ihre Sache zuständige Richterin, ob sie beide Klagen vor ihrem Gericht behandeln möchte. Brian Oxman argumentiert, dass die beiden Fälle miteinander in Beziehung stehen. Die Anwälte von Katherine Jackson sowie AEG Live sind von der Idee wenig begeistert; AEGs Anwälte sagen, dass die beiden Klagen inhaltlich nichts miteinander zu tun haben.

Quellen: jackson.ch, bhcourier.com

http://www.jackson.ch/html/news.html

[geli2709]

05.05.2011: Katherines und Joes Klagen werden vom gleichen Richter bewältigt

Die Los Angeles Superior Court Richterin Yvette Palazuelos entschied, sowohl die Klage von Katherine Jackson gegen AEG Live als auch die Klage von Joe Jackson gegen Conrad Murray zu bewältigen. Sie lehnte es allerdings ab, die Klagen zu einer Klage zu fusionieren. (vergleiche News vom 29.04.2011: “Evt. Zusammenführung von Zivilklagen?”)

Quelle: jackson.ch, bhcourier.com

http://jackson.ch/html/news.html

[Lena]

Ergänzend zum vorherigen Post:

Die beiden Klagen werden vom gleichen Gericht behandelt aber nicht miteinander verlinkt:

http://www.bhcourier.com/article/Local/Local/Katherine_Jackson_To_Manage_Case_Filed_By_Her_Husband/75846

(CNS) Posted Tuesday May 3, 2011 – 10:25am
A judge presiding over Katherine Jackson's negligence lawsuit against AEG Live said today she will also manage a case filed by the late King of Pop's father.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos's ruling on Monday does not consolidate the cases into one, but does mean that Joe Jackson's case will no longer be heard by a separate judge.

[Lena]

Hier auch ein Friedmann-Artikel zur Oxman-Suspendierung:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2011/06/01/michael-jackson-lawyer-brian-oxman-suspended-from-practicing-law-again

For the the third time in his career, Brian Oxman is getting suspended from practicing law. Oxman, a constant presence on TV who identifies himself as the “Jackson family lawyer,” isn’t the only one in trouble this time. So is his wife, Maureen Jaroscak, who is also a lawyer in California. In a decision filed by the State Bar of California on March 3, 2011, the agency has recommended that Oxman be suspended for two years, with a third year of suspension stayed based on Oxman proving that he’s mended his ways.

In addition to reporting to the Bar Association four times a year during the three years, Oxman must also “must attend and satisfactorily complete the State Bar’s Ethics School and State Bar’s Client Trust Accounting School and provide satisfactory proof of such completion to the State Bar’s Office of Probation.” Jaroscak has been similarly recommended for punishment. And the couple must take and pass the Multi State Professional Responsibility Examination during their suspensions.

What happened? Oxman’s problems stem from 2004, when he represented a woman named Raquel Axelrod in her divorce from husband John Larson. It’s a complicated tale, but ended with Oxman being ordered by a bankruptcy court to pay Larson–the ex husband of Oxman’s client–a little over $5,000 in sanctions. Oxman simply failed to do so, even though he entered into several settlement agreements. Oxman also never reported the sanction to the Bar Association, and never paid it.

At the same time, Oxman and Jaroscak were involved in an eight year long scheme, according to the Star Bar of California’s filing, to hijack another client’s estate worth more than $500,000. This story, separate from the Axelrod/Larson one, shows Jaroscak completely ignoring rulings from the State Supreme Court and the California Bar as she willfully kept money from brother and sister Gerald and Sarah Quattrrochi after their parents died.

In both cases, the Star Bar decision found that the Oxmans “lacked candor”–which is a nice way of saying they lied about everything.

Interestingly, all of this was going on as Oxman grandstanded in Michael Jackson’s child molestation and conspiracy case, slept in court and snored loudly, and was eventually fired from the case by Jackson chief legal counsel, Thomas Mesereau. Mesereau, busy with keeping Jackson out of jail–which he did–had no idea all this was going on simultaneously.

And that’s not all: the State Bar also found that Oxman and Jaroscak co-mingled their funds with those of their clients, used their Client Trust Account to hide money from their own many creditors, and basically lied about everything else in their professional lives including fees they received for teaching at UC Irvine. Oxman was found guilty of four counts of misconduct, his wife five counts. Why they weren’t barred from ever practicing law again is a mystery considering this is Oxman’s third suspension. The State Bar also accused Jaroscak of “moral turpitude.” (That is very ugly; you rarely hear that expression anymore. It’s severe.)

But the court said in its decision that since Oxman and Jaroscak had admitted to some of their wrong doing and helped with the investigation, they would receive leniency. Oxman should also receive credit, the court said, for donating his time to the Plotkin Bail Bond school in Norwalk, California. I wish the court had done a little homework: back in 2005, when Michael Jackson was on trial, Oxman was in business with Dorry Plotkin regarding Michael Jackson’s bail and loans against his parents’ home in Encino, California. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156897,00.html. Oxman was busy making money, not donating it, at the time. He and Plotkin are childhood buddies.

Maybe now media bookers will finally understand who Oxman is. Maybe the Jackson family will finally get it, too. Recently, Oxman represented Joseph Jackson in his futile attempts to sue AEG Live and others for Michael’s death. Their lawsuits were thrown out in the end.

[Christine3110]

The Jackson's won't get it!

[Lena]

Michael Jackson death: Lawsuit could be impacted by doctor’s criminal trial
By Tammy McCoy, on June 1st, 2011
By City News Service

The outcome of the involuntary manslaughter case against Michael Jackson’s personal physician could affect the length of the trial of a related civil lawsuit next year, an attorney for the late singer’s mother told a judge Wednesday.

Lawyer Kevin Boyle, during a hearing before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos, predicted Katherine Jackson’s civil case against AEG Live would take about four weeks to try, not including what is expected to be a lengthy jury selection process.

The company promoted a series of sold-out London concerts for which Jackson was rehearsing in Los Angeles at the time of his death.

However, Boyle said that if Dr. Conrad Murray, who was with the entertainer when he died, is convicted, the jury in the civil case will not have to deal with the negligence issues in the case and can focus squarely on whether AEG Live was Murray’s employer.

AEG Live attorneys dispute that their client employed Murray, whose criminal case trial was recently rescheduled for September.
“I think the (civil) trial would be considerably shorter,” Boyle said after the hearing.

However, AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said he was not sure a conviction in Murray’s criminal case would have the impact Boyle predicts. He also said the civil case could take even longer to try than Boyle’s estimate.

Palazuelos scheduled the civil suit trial for Sept. 10, 2012. She said she also will keep the case before her despite the possibility it will last several weeks and noted she recently tried another lengthy case.
“If I can try try an asbestos case in 14 to 21 days, there’s no reason I can’t try your case,” the judge told the attorneys.

The lawsuit was filed last September by Katherine Jackson on behalf of herself and her son’s three children, Michael Jr., Paris-Michael Katherine and Prince Michael. It alleges AEG Live is responsible for the medical decisions made by Murray, who has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death.

The 50-year-old singer died June 25, 2009, of acute propofol intoxication.

Palazuelos also is managing a separate suit filed against Murray by the singer’s father, Joe Jackson, that alleges wrongful death. The case was not part of today’s hearing. A Nov. 2 status conference is scheduled in that suit.

http://www.swrnn.com/2011/06/01/mich...riminal-trial/

[Lena]

Hier noch eine deutsche Zusammenfassung aus dem Schweizer Forum zum Vorpost.

03.06.2011: Einfluss vom Murray Prozess auf die Zivilklage gegen AEG Live

Der Prozess gegen Dr. Murray wegen fahrlässiger Tötung könnte die Dauer der Zivilklage von Katherine Jackson gegen AEG Live beeinflussen. Miss Jacksons Anwalt Kevin Boyle sagte während einer Anhörung vor dem Los Angeles Superior Court, dass er mit einer Prozesslänge von etwa vier Wochen rechne, die Jury Auwahl nicht berücksichtigt. Je nach Ausgang vom Prozess gegen Dr. Conrad Murray, könne die Jury sich im Zivilprozess (nur) darauf konzentrieren, inwieweit der Konzertveranstalter AEG Live verantwortlich war für Conrad Murrays Entscheidungen und Behandlung von Michael Jackson. Der Anwalt von AEG Live, Marvin Putnam, bezweifelt eine so kurze Dauer des Prozesses.

Die LA Superior Court Richterin Palazuelos setzte den Beginn der Zivilklage auf den 10. September 2012 an. Die Klage wurde Ende letzten Jahres von Katherine Jackson in ihrem und dem Namen von Michaels drei Kindern eingereicht. Darin wird AEG Live vorgeworfen, verantwortlich für die medizinischen Entscheidungen von Conrad Murray zu sein.

Quelle: jackson.ch, swrnn.com

[geli2709]

02.07.2011: Joe Jackson möchte AEG seiner Zivilklage hinzufügen

Die Anwälte für Joe Jacksons Zivilklage gegen Murray wollen dieser auch AEG Live als Angeklagte hinzufügen. Gerichtspapiere, die diese Woche von den Anwälten Brian Oxman und Mareen Jaroscak eingereicht wurden, beschuldigen den Konzertveranstalter AEG Live, verantwortlich für die Anstellung von Murray zu sein. Die Führungsspitze von AEG Live sei unglücklich über einige Probe-Absenzen von Michael Jackson gewesen und habe es nicht gern gesehen, dass er Medikamente von verschiedenen Ärzten, inklusive Dr. Arnold Klein, verabreicht bekam. Aus diesem Grund habe dann der This Is It Konzertveranstalter Dr. Conrad Murray angestellt.

Die Anwälte von Murray haben der Hinzufügung von AEG Live zugestimmt. Das Gericht in Los Angeles muss dem Antrag aber noch zustimmen und setzte eine Anhörung für den 6. September an.

AEG Live ist auch von Katherine Jackson in einer separaten Klage angeklagt worden.

Quelle: jackson.ch, bhcourier.com

http://www.jackson.ch/html/news.html

[Christine3110]

Also ich habe gerade gelesen, dass aus Unterlagen die AEG vorgelegt hat, ganz eindeutig hervorgeht, dass Murray NICHT durch AEG sondern von Michael eingestellt wurde.

[Jackie2010]

Ich denke, genau dieser Vertrag soll noch am Todestag UNUNTERSCHRIEBEN in Michaels Schlafzimmer gelegen haben...?