thread oben

Einklappen

Ankündigung

Einklappen
Keine Ankündigung bisher.

Anklage gegen Murray und AEG durch Joe Jackson

Einklappen
Dieses Thema ist geschlossen.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Zeit
  • Anzeigen
Alles löschen
neue Beiträge

  • Welchen Eindruck soll man davon kriegen? Hier erfüllt wieder mal jemand alle Klischees und Joe rückt genau in das Bild. Oder alles Ente?

    Kommentar


    • Zitat von Christine3110 Beitrag anzeigen
      Joe's lawyer, Brian Oxman, also says he may take the depositions of more than 60 people who have info regarding Jackson's death.

      B.O. sagte auch, er sei in der Lage mehr als 60 Leute zu benennen, die Informationen über MJs Tod geben können.
      Die würden mich mal interessieren und vorallem, WAS die auszusagen hätten. Wäre sicherlich interessant.

      Kommentar


      • Hier ein Radio-Interview mit Goom-Radio.

        Joe sagt, dass er Murray auf 500 Mio. verklagt, aber Murray ist nur der "Fall Guy". Es gibt eine Menge anderer Leute. Er klagt so hoch, weil je höher man klagt, desto mehr kriegt man.
        Michael ist sein Sohn. Er will Gerechtigkeit.
        Nach einen Schnitt im Gepräch sagt er noch etwas zum Oprah-Besuch auf die Frage, ob er Oprah hinterhergelaufen sei. Nein, das wäre er nicht, sie wäre um ihn herumgewesen.
        Sie ist eine berrühmte anerkannte Person, sie ist ein Star. Aber Sie war in Deinem Haus? Ja viele (Stars) sind in meinem Haus.

        Kommentar


        • Neue Schlappe für J.J. und Oxman

          Judge Declines to Hear Jackson Wrongful Death Case

          Judge tosses wrongful death case filed by Michael Jackson's dad; lawsuit goes to state court

          The Associated Press

          By ANTHONY McCARTNEY AP Entertainment Writer
          LOS ANGELES November 1, 2010 (AP)

          A wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Michael Jackson's father will now be handled by a state court after a federal judge said Monday he didn't have authority to hear the case and that the singer's father would be unlikely to collect tens of millions of dollars in damages in his court.

          Joe Jackson's attorney agreed to dismiss part of his case against the doctor charged in the pop superstar's death, which prompted the judge to rule that the remaining issues had to be heard in state court.

          U.S. District Judge John F. Walter opened a hearing Monday by telling Joe Jackson's attorney that he didn't think Jackson's father could receive any money from one of the major causes of action, which alleged the singer's rights were violated under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

          "I am firmly convinced that you can't seek damages on this (disabilities act) cause of action," Walter said.

          The judge said that was the only federal issue in the case and he would not handle any other issues. "This is a creature of state law, this wrongful death claim," the judge said.

          Joe Jackson's attorney, Brian Oxman, agreed to dismiss the ADA-related claim and said he would refile the case in Los Angeles Superior Court soon.

          Walter had previously expressed doubts that the case belonged in federal court, but had allowed it to remain until the case's first scheduling hearing Monday.

          The lawsuit will likely join a case filed by the Jackson family patriarch's wife against concert promoter AEG Live. Katherine Jackson sued the company, which planned and promoted a series of London concerts Michael Jackson was preparing for when he died unexpectedly in June 2009.

          She has accused the promoter of failing to give Dr. Conrad Murray lifesaving equipment and properly oversee him while he cared for her son during preparations for the concerts. AEG has said the lawsuit is meritless.

          "Given the two cases pending, it makes no sense to have them separated," Oxman said. "It's a matter of practicality."

          Murray has been charged with involuntary manslaughter and was named in Joe Jackson's lawsuit, but not in the case filed by Katherine Jackson.

          Murray's attorney, Charles H. Peckham, told Walter that there would still be legal hurdles in state court for Joe Jackson's lawsuit. He said after the hearing that Murray will challenge whether the elder Jackson has the right to sue for wrongful death.

          Authorities have accused Murray of giving Michael Jackson a lethal dose of sedatives, including the anesthetic propofol, in the bedroom of the singer's rented mansion. Propofol is meant to be used in hospital settings.

          Murray has pleaded not guilty.

          Walter also said Monday he didn't want to wait for Murray's trial to conclude, and he warned the attorneys that if the case remained in his courtroom, it would not be significantly delayed.

          "I'm not going to wait around for two years, if you think that's how long the criminal case is going to take," the judge said.

          Murray is due back in criminal court Jan. 4 for the start of a preliminary hearing where prosecutors will lay out some of the evidence against him. His attorneys have said he did not give the one-time King of Pop anything that should have killed him.

          http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=12023730

          http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110103241.html

          In aller Kürze:

          Das von JJ angerufene Gericht erklärt sich in der Schadensersatzklage wegen widerrechtlicher Tötung für nicht zuständig.

          Der Richter des federal court erklärte, dass er überhaupt nur für den Teil der Klage zuständig sei, der die Verletzung des Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) betrifft. Er sei aber davon überzeugt, dass JJ auf dieser Grundlage keinen Schadensersatz erhalten werde.

          Dieser Teil wurde somit eingestellt bzw. abgewiesen. Die verbleibende Klage wird Oxman nun vor dem eigentlich zuständigen state court, dem Los Angeles Superior Court einreichen.

          Es klingt so, als wolle Oxman seine Klage mit der von K.J. eingereichten Klage gegen AEG verbinden. Hoffentlich weiß er, ob und wie dies umzusetzen ist!!!

          Am Ende findet sich noch eine interessante Einschätzung des Richters, was die Dauer des Strafverfahrens betrifft. Nach seiner Ansicht wird das Verfahren gegen Murray 2 Jahre dauern.

          Kommentar


          • Dr. Conrad Murrays Anwalt hat einen Antrag eingereicht, um Joe Jacksons Klage gegen ihn wegen fahrlässiger Tötung abzuweisen... hat TMZ erfahren. Murrays Anwalt, Charles Peckham, behauptet Joes Anwalt verpasste die Klagefrist und somit ist der Fall - mit Fokus auf den Tod von Michael Jackson - verjährt.

            Peckhams Einwand: Joe's Anwalt, Brian Oxman, reichte die Klage 158 Tage nach der 1-Jahres-Frist ein.

            Kommentar


            • Habe den Thread: Kathrine verklagt AEG nicht gefunden. Ggf. dahin verschieben.


              Kenny Ortega was sued by Katherine, who claimed he was part of AEG's alleged plan to give Michael anything he needed in order for him to perform.
              Katherine's lawyer, Kevin Boyle, tells TMZ, "Based on recently discovered information, the Jackson family has determined that Mr. Ortega should not be a defendant," adding, "The Jackson Family apologizes for any discomfort or inconvenience this may have caused Mr. Ortega."
              It's always a discomfort to be sued for wrongful death.


              Kenny Ortega fällt in jedem Fall als Beklagter weg. Bezüglich der kürzlich erhaltenen Informationen hat die Jackson-Familie entschieden, dass Mr. Ortega nicht beschuldigt werden soll. "Die Jackson-Familie entschuldigt sich für die ihm entstandenen Unannehmlichkeiten, teilte Kathrines Anwalt mit."
              Zuletzt geändert von Lena; 01.02.2011, 20:57.

              Kommentar


              • danke lena ,wenn das so stimmt, dann müßte es ja hier bald nachzulesen sein.


                Case Summary


                Please make a note of the Case Number.

                Click here to access document images for this case.
                If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
                Case Number: BC445597
                KATHERINE JACKSON ET AL VS AEG LIVE LLC ET AL

                Filing Date: 09/15/2010
                Case Type: Other Contract (General Jurisdiction)
                Status: Pending

                Future Hearings

                02/02/2011 at 08:46 am in department 28 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
                Conference-Case Management (HEARING ON DEMURRER (2)MOTION TO STRIKE)

                Documents Filed | Proceeding Information

                Parties

                AEG LIVE LLC - Defendant/Respondent

                ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. - Defendant/Respondent

                DOES 1 TO 100 - Defendant/Respondent

                GONGAWARE PAUL - Defendant/Respondent

                JACKSON KATHERINE - Plaintiff/Petitioner

                JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH JR. - Minor Plaintiff

                JACKSON PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE - Minor Plaintiff

                JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL II - Minor Plaintiff

                LEIWEKE TIMOTHY - Defendant/Respondent

                MAXWELL K.C. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                O'MELVENY & MEYERS LAW OFFICES OF - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                ORTEGA KENNETH - Defendant/Respondent

                ORTEGA KENNY - Defendant/Respondent's AKA

                PANISH BRIAN J. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                PHILLIPS BRANDON - Defendant/Respondent

                PHILLIPS RANDY - Defendant/Respondent's AKA

                THE BOESCH LAW GROUP - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information

                Please make a note of the Case Number.

                Click here to access document images for this case.
                If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

                Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

                01/26/2011 Reply/Response (defdts aeg live llc , anschutz entertainment group inc., brandon phillips, paul gongaware and timothy leiweke's reply in further support of demurrer to pltffs complaint; supplemtn decl)
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/26/2011 Reply/Response (DEDT KENNETH ORTEGA'S REPLY TO PLTFFS OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER )
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent


                01/26/2011 Statement-Case Management
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/20/2011 Proof of Service (corrected proof of service of case management statement )
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/20/2011 Opposition Document (plaintiffs oppositions to defdt kenneth ortega's demurrer and motion to strike )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                01/20/2011 Opposition Document (to demurrer )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                01/18/2011 Statement-Case Management
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/18/2011 Statement-Case Management
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                01/07/2011 Demurrer (defdt kenneth ortega's notice of demurrer and demurrer to pltffs complaint for damages )
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/07/2011 Motion to Strike (defdt kenneth ortega's notice of motion and motion to strike portions of the complaint for damages )
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                12/30/2010 Demurrer (DEFTS AEG LIVE LLC, ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., BRANDON PHILLIPS, PAUL GONGAWARE AND TIMOTHY LEIWEKES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER TO PLTFFS COMPLAINT; MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTH; DECL)
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                12/13/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt (AS TO DEFDT KENNETH ORTEGA AKA KENNY ORTEGA )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                12/01/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt ( AS TO PAUL GONGAWARE )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                12/01/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt (as to AEG LIVE LLC )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                12/01/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt (AS TO DEFDT TIMOTHY LEIWEKE )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                12/01/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt (AS TO ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                12/01/2010 Ntc and Acknowledgement of Receipt ( AS TO BRANDON PHILLIPS (AKA RANDY PHILLIPS) AN INDIVIDUAL )
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                10/21/2010 Summons Filed
                Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                10/01/2010 Ord Apptng Guardian Ad Litem (FOR MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                10/01/2010 Application - misc (FOR PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                10/01/2010 Ord Apptng Guardian Ad Litem (FOR PRINCE MICHAEL JACKSON II )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                10/01/2010 Ord Apptng Guardian Ad Litem (FOR PARIS=MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/28/2010 Application - misc (FOR PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/28/2010 Application - misc (FOR MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/28/2010 Application - misc (FOR PRINCE MICHAEL JACKSON II GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/21/2010 Notice-Case Management Conference
                Filed by Clerk

                09/15/2010 Application - misc (FOR PRINCE MICHAEL JACKSON II GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/15/2010 Application - misc (FOR MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON JR GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                09/15/2010 Complaint

                09/15/2010 Application - misc (FOR PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE JACKSON GUARDIAN AD LITEM )
                Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

                und so sieht es auch bei Joe:




                Case Summary


                Please make a note of the Case Number.

                Click here to access document images for this case.
                If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
                Case Number: BC450393
                JOSEPH JACKSON ET AL VS CONRAD MURRAY ET AL

                Filing Date: 11/30/2010
                Case Type: Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
                Status: Pending

                Future Hearings

                02/08/2011 at 08:30 am in department 56 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
                OSC - No Return of Service (NOTICE TO:OXMAN R. BRIANFAILURE TO SERVEAPPLIED PHARMACY SERVICES ANDAPPLIED PHARMACY SERVICE, INC.**)

                03/08/2011 at 08:30 am in department 56 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
                Conference-Case Management

                03/23/2011 at 08:32 am in department 56 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
                DEMURRER (1. DEMURRER2. MOTION TO DISMISS)

                Documents Filed | Proceeding Information

                Parties

                ACRES HOME HEART & VASCULAR INSTITUTE - Defendant/Respondent

                APPLIED PHARMACY SERVICE INC. - Defendant/Respondent

                APPLIED PHARMACY SERVICES LLC - Defendant/Respondent

                DOES 1 THROUGH 20 - Defendant/Respondent

                FLANAGAN UNGER GROVER &MCCOOL - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                GCA HOLDINGS LLC - Defendant/Respondent

                JACKSON JOSEPH - Plaintiff/Petitioner

                JACKSON KATHERINE - Plaintiff/Petitioner

                JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH JR. - Minor Plaintiff

                JACKSON PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE - Minor Plaintiff

                JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL II - Minor Plaintiff

                MURRAY CONRAD - Defendant/Respondent

                OXMAN R. BRIAN ESQ. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

                Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information

                Please make a note of the Case Number.

                Click here to access document images for this case.
                If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

                Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

                01/20/2011 Demurrer (DEMURRER AND MOT/DISMISS )
                Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

                01/19/2011 Miscellaneous-Other (request for judicial notice )
                Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

                01/05/2011 Notice-Case Management Conference
                Filed by Clerk

                01/05/2011 OSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv
                Filed by Clerk

                11/30/2010 Complaint
                Zuletzt geändert von Brigitte 58; 01.02.2011, 21:23.

                Kommentar


                • Hätten sie sich mal vorher überlegen sollen. Sie haben doch miterlebt wie es jemandem geht, der fälschlicher Weise beschuldigt wurde. Ich glaube, das wird nicht ihre letzte Entschuldigung sein.

                  Ich stell mir grade vor...
                  AEG verklagt die Jacksons wg. böswilliger Verheimlichung der ihnen seit Jahren bekannten Tatsache, dass MJ ein hoffnungsloser druggie war, den sie mehrmals vergeblich versuchten vor sich selbst zu retten. Aber stattdessen habe man teilweise sogar spekuliert, selbst von dem geplanten Projekt profitieren zu können. Man habe MJ und AEG ins offene Messer laufen lassen.

                  Kommentar


                  • Hier die Vorgänge der letzten Wochen:

                    January 7th Kenny files his request to be removed as defendant
                    January 20th Katherine files her opposition to this request
                    January 26th Kenny files an additional response to address KJ's claims.
                    February 1 Katherine removes Kenny.

                    Kommentar


                    • print it send it
                      WENN

                      Kenny Ortega is continuing his battle to be dropped as a defendant in Katherine Jackson's lawsuit against AEG, and RadarOnline.com has his detailed legal filing.

                      READ THE COURT DOCUMENTS HERE

                      Ortega, the famed choreographer and director who was helming Michael Jackson's planned This Is It concert series, was named by Katherine Jackson as one of the people she believes is responsible for her son's death.






                      Nothing could be further from the truth, Ortega says and on January 26, he filed a Memorandum of Points and Authorities stating he was "wrongfully and mistakenly named as a defendant in this case."

                      PHOTOS: Katherine Jackson Holds Memorial For Michael

                      Ortega, the document states "has been extremely hurt by this mistaken and misguided Complaint publicly naming him as a defendant allegedly responsible for his friend's death."

                      He's asking the court to remove him as a defendant in Katherine's ongoing lawsuit against the giant entertainment and sports presentation company, AEG.

                      PHOTOS: Jackson Family In Court

                      A hearing is set for February 2.
                      Angehängte Dateien
                      Zuletzt geändert von Brigitte 58; 01.02.2011, 22:01.

                      Kommentar


                      • @ Lena

                        Es gibt bisher noch keinen Thread zu diesem Thema !

                        Habe kürzlich ebenfalls stundenlang vergeblich danach gesucht.
                        Alle Informationen dazu sind wahrscheinlich in diesem Thread oder an anderer Stelle untergegangen

                        Ich würde es ja für sinnvoll halten, einen seperaten Thread zu eröffnen und dort alles diesbezügliche zusammen zu tragen, damit man weiß, wo man nachlesen oder anknüpfen kann.

                        Bezüglich deiner o.g. Information hatte ich nämlich vor kurzem gelesen, dass der Anwalt von Kenny Ortega dem Gericht einen Antrag gestellt hat, seinen Mandaten aus der Klage zu entlassen, weil er weder einen Vertrag mit Michael oder Dr. Murray gehabt hätte, noch bei AEG angestellt wäre.
                        Ich gehe daher davon aus, dass diesem Antrag nun stattgegeben wurde und der Sachverhalt hier zu Gunsten Katherines etwas verdreht ausgelegt wird oder ihre Anwälte der zu erwartenden Gerichtsentscheidung clevererweise auf diese Art vorgriffen.

                        Nachtrag: Entschuldigung für die teilweise Wiederholung, ich war etwas langsam !
                        Zuletzt geändert von geli2709; 01.02.2011, 22:35.

                        Kommentar


                        • Zitat von Lena Beitrag anzeigen
                          Hier die Vorgänge der letzten Wochen:

                          January 7th Kenny files his request to be removed as defendant
                          January 20th Katherine files her opposition to this request
                          January 26th Kenny files an additional response to address KJ's claims.
                          February 1 Katherine removes Kenny.
                          Was haben sie denn in den paar Tagen so erstaunlich neues rausgefunden, dass sie ihn jetzt plötzlich von ihrer Paylist streichen?

                          Und wer erstattet Kenny nun seine Anwaltskosten? Randy und Karen?
                          Das ist alles eine Farce.

                          Karen's trotziger tweet:
                          "Though Ortega obviously didnt murder Michael, in my opinion he is culpable in other ways."
                          Zuletzt geändert von Christine3110; 01.02.2011, 22:14.

                          Kommentar


                          • Das ist gar nicht zum Lachen, Christine!

                            Denn theoretischist es sogar durchaus vorstellbar, dass die Karten da für AEG gar nicht mal die schlechtesten wären.
                            Im Gegensatz zu unsicheren Fellower-Beschreibungen über Michaels körperliche Verfassung und vagen Aussagen über familiäre Interventionen gegen Michaels Medikamenteneinnahmen hätte AEG handfeste Nachweise vorzulegen.

                            Ob die unversöhnliche Tour gegen AEG, mit der Michaels Eltern ja gleich nach der Trauerfeier im Staples Center begannen, letztendlich nicht für nachhaltige Verärgerung und Verhärtung bei AEG gesorgt hat, bleibt abzuwarten.
                            Sicher haben die nicht weniger Presseausschnitte gesammelt als unser Newsman hier im Forum.

                            Kommentar



                            • kann vielleicht jemand mal da reinschauen????

                              hat kenny erst mal einen antrag gestellt und es geht erst morgen
                              um die entscheidung, oder um was geht es morgen?

                              A hearing is set for February 2.
                              Zuletzt geändert von Brigitte 58; 01.02.2011, 22:29.

                              Kommentar


                              • Was willste denn aus dem Einspruch von Ortega wissen Brigitte?

                                Wg. Ortega muss ja nun nix mehr entschieden werden.

                                Kommentar

                                thread unten

                                Einklappen
                                Lädt...
                                X